Le samedi 14 avril 2012 22:21:53, Frank Warmerdam a écrit :
> Even,
> 
> I am generally in favor of this, but I aspire in GDAL 2.0 to migrate
> OGR to using GDALDriver mechanisms which would include being based
> around GDALOpenInfo.  I am not sure if it is better to make the
> GDALOpenInfo change as part of that broader effort or as a distinct
> RFC and work item.

What do you call "using GDALDriver mechanisms" exactly ?

Because I don't see how we can make OGRSFDriver extend GDALDriver if that's 
what you have in mind... 
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Reply via email to