Selon William Kyngesburye <[email protected]>: > As I worked on a test case and fiddled around with a few other ideas, I think > I found the error of my ways. > > The computer I was doing the conversion from vrt to PostGIS has GDAL 1.8. In > my test case, GDAL 1.9 correctly preserves the FIDs. Was -preserve_fid > broken in 1.8?
Not that I'm aware of. -preserve_fid job is pretty stupid. I'd bet more on a difference in another place, perhaps in the VRT driver. > I see the option listed in the help for 1.8, but not > described (it is described in the 1.9 help). > > But, neither version reports the FID column info on a vrt. Though it does on > the PostGIS table. Ah ok, I see what you mean. The VRT driver does not currently report that it does use the source FID if it is specified. It is a matter of implementing the GetFIDColumn() method. Would you mind opening a ticket about that ? _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
