On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Jason Roberts <jason.robe...@duke.edu> wrote: > As I mentioned, I do not have a strong opinion about the value of accepting > multiple inputs. The obvious workaround is to call the same method in a > loop. The main obvious downside of that is having to create and manage the > temporary outputs. I haven't thought about it enough to know whether there > are other disadvantages (e.g. performance). I just thought I should mention > it to you, in case you thought of some or were desiring to achieve parity > with ArcGIS. >
Hi Jason personally I would leave to GDAL the most basic functionality. Pretty sure that after it there will be many tools, including Desktop GIS, giving that feature (batch processing). Btw, Ari, really cool stuff, looking forward to it, thanks for the great effort ;) cheers p -- Paolo Corti Geospatial software developer web: http://www.paolocorti.net twitter: @capooti skype: capooti _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
