On May 16, 2012, at 6:03 AM, J Luis wrote:

> 
> From it's placement in the above and a vague memory of the old ecw builds, I 
> suspect the carbon part comes from ECW.  those separate libNCEcw* libraries 
> are an old way of building ECW, the newer method builds as a single libecwj2. 
>  ECW is a PITA to compile on OSX (my notes still leave some unsolved 
> problems).
> 
> Yes, you are right. I built --with-ecw=no and that part disappeared. I use 
> this old one because (if I remember well) its license terms are much liberal, 
> and because it works as I have it.
> 
The same version also has the single libecwj2 build option.  See my build 
instructions on my site.

>  But for the error, it maybe because it's using the wrong command to link - 
> this is C++, and that's where the new() op is from.  Normally, the easy way 
> to link is use g++, which automatically links the necessary C++ library.  But 
> your link command is using gcc, which would need the C++ library linked in 
> manually.  This is odd because libtool is passed g++, but ends up using gcc.  
> Did you update libtool in your GDAL source?
> 
>  
> I didn't mentioned explicitly but I did a svn update so the code should be 
> very close to what's in 1.9.1rc
> Anyone building the release candidate on OSX with XCode 4.3.2 successfully?
> 
> Joaquim

1.9.1rc compiles with no problems (quick-n-dirty, no extras).

I just noticed something else, but I don't know if it's a problem - your 
libtool command has a "--tag=LD" flag in it, mine doesn't not.  You also get 
that message about ignoring unknown tag, and I wonder if it somehow confuses 
libtool so that it drops the g++.  What is your configure command?

-----
William Kyngesburye <kyngchaos*at*kyngchaos*dot*com>
http://www.kyngchaos.com/

"This is a question about the past, is it? ... How can I tell that the past 
isn't a fiction designed to account for the discrepancy between my immediate 
physical sensations and my state of mind?"

- The Ruler of the Universe


_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Reply via email to