> I could certainly do that, but with the '+wktext' mechanism, there is > no reason to add this patch anymore, is there?
Your patch is a cleaner solution than the +wktext mechanism, which remains something a bit hacky (although I must admit I had never heard before of that QSC projection ! and it is probably some niche projection). The advantage of having it properly recognized is that you can then embed its WKT representation in a .aux.xml file and all tools using GDAL will be able to deal properly with it. But reading again your initial email, I didn't realize that it is not yet supported in proj, only proposed. So we will wait for it to be committed in PROJ first before committing its support in GDAL. > > Best regards, > Martin > _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
