On 21 August 2012 12:01, Radim Blazek <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
> is it safe to use GDALSetRasterNoDataValue() with
> std::numeric_limits<double>::quiet_NaN()?
What kind of safety do you mean?
AFAICT, it does not sound sensible anyway.
Use of NaN would give unreliable results, by definition of NaN:
double n1 = std::numeric_limits<double>::quiet_NaN();
double n2 = std::numeric_limits<double>::quiet_NaN();
assert(n1 != n2);
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
