Hi, I'm wondering if we shouldn't release GDAL trunk as GDAL 1.10 instead of GDAL 2.0.
As far as I know, there haven't been yet any change in GDAL trunk that qualifies as a major re-architecturing, or that breaks the C API & ABI of the GDAL 1.X series. I'm not sure if or when someone will want to tackle one of the items listed in http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/GDAL20Changes , but this would likely defer a release by months, especially if we want a GDAL 2.0 with a number of significant changes. And sticking with our traditional yearly release rythm seems to me like a good practice. Current trunk has nothing revolutionary, but a nice amount of new drivers and fixes/improvements that are worth a release. Thoughts ? Regards, Even _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
