Le dimanche 11 novembre 2012 20:00:37, Ben Discoe a écrit : > +1 to everything Ragi said. > > Version "numbering" like "1.10" is an affront to common sense and the basic > concept of the decimal system, not to mention every OS's filename sorting. > If 1.10 comes after 1.9, then it would be imperative to replace the > misleading decimal points (which are, apparently, NOT decimal points) with > some other punctuation (like 1-9, 1-10) to avoid confusion on precedence, > and even that doesn't address the sorting mess.
Ben, The version number has never been a real number. "1.9.2" is for example our latest stable release. > > Enough changes have occurred since 1.0 (I know, since I was in fact using > GDAL then). > Please just call it 2.0 now. To my eyes, the amount of changes is not the rationale for the version number. GDAL being primarly a library, API/ABI considerations matter most. Even _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
