On 11/21/2012 5:32 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
Isaac's post is quite informative. However, combined with the Wikipedia entry and Even's comment, the post is incomplete as it does not represent the shear coefficients, but that's pretty straightforward to understand. I think the simplest summary is that the coeffs 1,2,4,and 5 are the terms of the matrix that we get from a concatenation of the rotation, sheer, and scaling matrices.On 21 November 2012 12:06, Even Rouault <[email protected]> wrote:Selon David Strip <[email protected]>: But that raises a new question about pixel resolution. If I read this carefully, what I conclude is the [1] is the pixel resolution of a transformed pixel in true E/W space. It is not the resolution in the x-direction in the original raster. Is that correct? If I want the resolution in the original raster, I have to solve for the underlying scale factors, resolutions, shear, and rotation angle. That's six unknowns and four equations. |
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
