Selon Jeff McKenna <jmcke...@gatewaygeomatics.com>: > On 13-01-08 9:26 PM, Even Rouault wrote: > > Ah ok, so I must mention that the online documentation is always up-to-date > > with the latest trunk version (it is refreshed each night). So the fact > that > > something is documented is not a sign of stability by itself. It can be a > new > > development committed just a few hours ago. > > Hello Even, Stefan, > > I wonder if that ogr_formats.html table needs a new column for "GDAL > Version", that could let users know what GDAL version works with each > driver.
There are different schools on the topic. I know Frank is not too keen on mentionning versionning, although personnaly, I try to mention version differences in the format page itself (http://www.gdal.org/ogr/drv_osm.html mentions GDAL/OGR >= 1.10.0). But at the end, in drivers with a lot of activity, it becomes cluttered with mentions like "in version X, in version Y". Having different version of the documentation, for each version, on the server could solve that, although it is sometimes usefull to identify quickly that a particular feature has been introduced in a version. > > -jeff > > > > -- > Jeff McKenna > MapServer Consulting and Training Services > http://www.gatewaygeomatics.com/ > > > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev > _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
