> Impressive, logical, complete, and verbose. > > The only small addition I might suggest is a driver capabilities flag to > announce whether or not it has multiple geometry field support. It could > simply be the driver that has not been updated to support multiple > geometry fields or the fact that the driver's model itself doesn't fit the > idea of multiple geometry fields. In either case, it would be good to be > able to ask.
Hi Howard, Too verbose maybe ;-) , since you probably missed the (discrete) mention to the OLCCreateGeomField capability (at layer level since CreateGeomField() is a OGRLayer method) Even -- Geospatial professional services http://even.rouault.free.fr/services.html _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
