Le mercredi 24 juillet 2013 16:07:49, Andreas Neumann a écrit : > Hi, > > I can't comment about the technical issues. But from a user point of > view there is a need to have more than one geometry representation per > feature. There could be several generalizations attached to a feature, > or different states. > > I would welcome such a feature in OGR. > > I guess Swisstopo also has a specific use case in mind since they > sponsor the work. Do you know which?
Andreas, I believe there are in particular interested in being able to make use of the multiple geometry support available in the Interlis format ( the Interlis spec itself is a bit complicated to follow. The most obvious evidence I found about multiple geometry in Interlis is http://www.eisenhutinformatik.ch/interlis/ili2fme/interlis2-20120202.pdf paragraph 12.2 ) Funnily enough, this topic was raised in this old thread : http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/2008-January/thread.html#15880 Even -- Geospatial professional services http://even.rouault.free.fr/services.html _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
