Le lundi 10 novembre 2014 20:20:25, Robert Coup a écrit : > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 1:40 AM, Even Rouault <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > Is there any other comment on this, before I call for a vote on it ? > > FWIW, sounds great to me. :) > > I presume that the concept is to add curve-specific geometry functions > (rather than their linear equivalents) over time, as eg. > GEOS/PostGIS/whatever support them?
Well, this is really for GEOS operations. Not sure if GEOS has a plan to support operations on curves one day. Would likely be a lot of work and probably depends on if JTS does such a move. Regarding PostGIS, the conversion between OGR curve geometries and PostGIS curve geometries is 100% operationnal with the RFC. > In that case, should it be made clear > in the RFC "that non-linear geometries are first converted to their linear > approximation." is a "for now/worst case" thing? Precision added. Thanks > > Rob :) -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spatialys.com _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
