Le lundi 05 janvier 2015 14:22:06, Martin Landa a écrit : > Hi, > > in r28290 I set up some metadata for OGR GRASS driver. In this light, > I would have some questions: > > 1) is it necessary to name OGR driver differently from GDAL driver (in > this case "GRASS" vs. "OGR_GRASS")?
Yes, if they are not technically the same driver (which is the case here), they must have distinct names since the registration is now common among all drivers. > 2) historically manual pages in GDAL were named "frmt_" and in OGR > "drv_", this should be consolidated(?) The actual name doesn't seem to be that important to me to justify the change and breaks existing URLs. No strong opinion though. > 2a) probably manual pages for drivers which have both raster and > vector capabilities (like GRASS driver) should be merged together? They can certainly be linked together at the very least. I'd say it would be perhaps a bit too far to merge the pages when the drivers aren't technically unified. And even for unified ones, like GeoPackage, I've created a new page http://gdal.org/drv_geopackage_raster.html for the raster capabilities, but mainly because the content of the vector and raster pages were big enough to have their own pages. Even -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spatialys.com _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
