On 2015-04-08 10:05 AM, Even Rouault wrote:
Daniel,
No comment on the actual change which sounds fine to me.
However, could we add a "Version: ..." field to the header of RFCs to
make it easier to track down the version to which a RFC applies? I saw
that you indicate the version in the status field after a RFC has been
implemented, but while it's in draft and during the discussion phase
there is no indication of the target version.
Sure, added
Thanks. That will help. FYI I added a missing [[BR]] in the header.
--
Daniel Morissette
T: +1 418-696-5056 #201
http://www.mapgears.com/
Provider of Professional MapServer Support since 2000
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
