On Wednesday 22 July 2015 17:03:38 Dmitry Baryshnikov wrote: > Hi everybody, > > Just a friendly remainder about motion adopt RFC48. Geographical > networks support. > > Now we have +2 (+1 from me as proposer and +1 from Even). Formally the > RFC can be adopted, but maybe there is some disagreement or some > valuable comments.
Hum, actually I'm not sure if we shouldn't need at least another +1 from a PSC member. The interpretation of the rules at "https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc1_pmc" is not completely clear to me in the case the proposer is not a PSC member. """ 1. Proposals are written up and submitted on the gdal-dev mailing list for discussion and voting, by any interested party, not just committee members. 6. Anyone may comment on proposals on the list, but only members of the Project Management Committee's votes will be counted. 7. A proposal will be accepted if it receives +2 (including the proposer) and no vetos (-1). """ > > Best regards, > Dmitry > > > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spatialys.com _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
