Hi Rashad and all, Wolf and I have joined in working on libkml. We will be getting more transitioned from the old code.google.com site to https://github.com/google/libkml, will be pushing some general maintanence patches and will be getting the pull request processed. We look forward to collaborating on future development of libkml.
-kurt On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 9:59 PM, Kurt Schwehr <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Rashad, > > I am starting to look into libkml from the Google side. I will chat with > mashbridge in next week and see if we can get some motion on libkml. > > -kurt > Engineer at Google > > On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Rashad M <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Even Rouault <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> > >>> > No API changes. it make building and configuring libkml easier! >>> > >>> > Correct me If I am wrong, I guess with a pkg-config would be easier to >>> find >>> > and configure libkml libs. >>> >>> Yes, that would probably be better. That said my experience with GDAL >>> configure >>> --with-libkml has been good up to now. But having a pkg-config script >>> could >>> simplify the current detection and configuration logic. >>> >>> Another action would be to change the documentation page of the libkml >>> driver >>> and related Trac wiki pages to point to your fork. >>> >>> By the way, did you try running the ogr_libkml.py tests from GDAL >>> autotest >>> suite with your fork ? >>> >>> What is the Windows status of the fork ? And with a Windows build of >>> GDAL ? >>> >> >> I had tested on VS2010 on windows7 and works fine. with a gdal windows >> built, I haven't tested yet. I will get back to you on that and also on >> ogr_libkml.py test >> >>> >>> To answer your initial question, yes, changes should go as a patch to a >>> Trac >>> ticket. >>> >>> -- >>> Spatialys - Geospatial professional services >>> http://www.spatialys.com >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Rashad >> >> _______________________________________________ >> gdal-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev >> > > > > -- > -- > http://schwehr.org > -- -- http://schwehr.org
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
