Hello Graeme,

I agree that looks interesting - it would be good to see the results of some empirical tests on height data. I have had similar problems to you with some resampling algorithms (https://github.com/geo-data/cesium-terrain-builder/issues/4): 'average' seemed to produce good results with height data for our use case.

Best regards,

Homme.

On 19/10/15 10:12, Graeme B. Bell wrote:
http://johncostella.webs.com/magic/

I came across this article recently. Is this available as a resampling kernel 
in GDAL? It looks very interesting.

We have been processing landscape height GeoTIFFs with GDAL and in recent 
projects we found anything beyond the ‘bilinear’ mode in GDAL had a tendency to 
introduce problematic artefacts. (With height data, 2D visual artefacts 
effectively become small artificial landscape structures that can interfere 
with modelling of e.g. slopes, soil erosion, contours, terrain driving costs).

Graeme Bell
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Reply via email to