Hi Ari, On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Ari Jolma <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'd like to ask the PSC and others to vote on adopting RFC 61: Support > for measured geometries. > > The draft RFC is at > > https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc61_support_for_measured_geometries > > and a draft implementation is at > > https://github.com/ajolma/GDAL-XYZM > > which is tested at > > https://travis-ci.org/ajolma/GDAL-XYZM > > (the test #34, which passed, was the so far last one after core changes > with unchanged autotests and a rather comprehensive set of WKT tests in the > Perl tests directory) > > This is seemingly a small change but it is at the heart of OGR so it has > some important implications. The only backwards incompatibilities that have > appeared so far are with some drivers, for example shapefile, which can be > lessened with, e.g., open options. > Can you explain more in detail about the backwards incompatibilities and how to soften them? What's going to break and what are the specific options? -- Sean Gillies
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
