Thanks. I'm glad it isn't just me! I have never messed with autoconfig but I'm certainly capable of testing when the time comes.
carl On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Kurt Schwehr <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Carl, > > Adding "VPATH" support for the autoconf setup has been on my wish list of > things to have in the current build system. It will take a bit of > patching. And hasn't made it up to the top of my priority list (and won't > for a while) > > So the answer is: Not yet. > > If anyone wants to take a stab at it and post the patch, I'd be happy to > give it a look and test it. > > -kurt > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 7:01 AM, Carl Godkin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> With a shiny new version of GDAL now available (thanks!), I'm wondering >> about a problem with the builds that I always have but have never asked >> about before. >> >> Since I need to build several Linux variants of various third party >> libraries, I can usually persuade "configure" and make to work from a >> sub-directory like this: >> >> cd library && mkdir version1 && cd version1 >> ../configure options... >> make >> >> followed by >> >> cd library && mkdir version2 && cd version2 >> ../configure options... >> make >> >> and >> >> cd library && mkdir version3 && cd version3 >> ../configure options... >> make >> >> so that I end up with three completely independent builds of the library >> in the sub-directories. >> >> I've never been able to get this sort of build to work with GDAL >> however. I know configure has a million options so I may have overlooked a >> trick for this. >> >> Has anyone else been successful trying this with GDAL? >> >> Thanks, >> >> carl >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> gdal-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev >> > > > > -- > -- > http://schwehr.org >
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
