I was fiddling with Even's geopackage examples
<http://erouault.blogspot.com/2014/12/gdal-geopackage-raster-support.html>
when I came across a core dump issue in gdal_translate
gdal version is compiled from github trunk as of 15 February 2016 under
Ubuntu 15.10 x64
gdal_translate --version
GDAL 2.1.0dev, released 2015/99/99
I can share the geotiff in question if need be. Let me know if I can
provide any other helpful information
Basic command is:
gdal_translate \
Washington_SEC.tif \
test.gpkg \
-of GPKG \
-co TILE_FORMAT=PNG \
-co TILING_SCHEME=GoogleMapsCompatible
Out from Valgrind is:
jlmcgraw@UbuntuMate1504:~/Documents/myPrograms/gdal_tests$
CPL_DEBUG=ON \
> valgrind --tool=memcheck --leak-check=yes --read-var-info=yes \
> gdal_translate \
> Washington_SEC.tif \
> test.gpkg \
> -of GPKG \
> -co TILE_FORMAT=PNG \
> -co TILING_SCHEME=GoogleMapsCompatible
==30978== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==30978== Copyright (C) 2002-2015, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward
et al.
==30978== Using Valgrind-3.11.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for
copyright info
==30978== Command: gdal_translate Washington_SEC.tif test.gpkg -of
GPKG -co TILE_FORMAT=PNG -co TILING_SCHEME=GoogleMapsCompatible
==30978==
GDAL: GDALOpen(Washington_SEC.tif, this=0xf7e9d80) succeeds as GTiff.
Input file size is 15538, 11309
GDAL: GDAL_CACHEMAX = 100 MB
GDAL: GDALWarpKernel()::GWKGeneralCase()
Src=0,0,1944x1415 Dst=0,0,2737x1992
0GDAL: GDALWarpKernel()::GWKGeneralCase()
Src=1941,0,1945x1415 Dst=2737,0,2737x1992
.GDAL: GDALWarpKernel()::GWKGeneralCase()
Src=3883,0,1945x1415 Dst=5474,0,2737x1992
--30978-- warning: evaluate_Dwarf3_Expr: unhandled DW_OP_ 0xf2
--30978-- warning: evaluate_Dwarf3_Expr: unhandled DW_OP_ 0xf2
--30978-- warning: evaluate_Dwarf3_Expr: unhandled DW_OP_ 0xf2
--30978-- warning: evaluate_Dwarf3_Expr: unhandled DW_OP_ 0xf2
==30978== Invalid write of size 8
==30978== at 0x4C3259F: memset (in
/usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==30978== by 0x5692CD8: memset (string3.h:90)
==30978== by 0x5692CD8: GDALGeoPackageDataset::ReadTile(int, int,
unsigned char*, bool*) (gdalgeopackagerasterband.cpp:641)
==30978== by 0x5692FA2: GDALGeoPackageDataset::ReadTile(int, int)
(gdalgeopackagerasterband.cpp:489)
==30978== by 0x5694B51: GDALGeoPackageRasterBand::IReadBlock(int,
int, void*) (gdalgeopackagerasterband.cpp:733)
==30978== by 0x5553B15: GDALRasterBand::GetLockedBlockRef(int,
int, int) (gdalrasterband.cpp:1142)
==30978== by 0x5572525: GDALRasterBand::IRasterIO(GDALRWFlag,
int, int, int, int, void*, int, int, GDALDataType, long long, long
long, GDALRasterIOExtraArg*) (rasterio.cpp:307)
==30978== by 0x557312A:
GDALDataset::BlockBasedRasterIO(GDALRWFlag, int, int, int, int,
void*, int, int, GDALDataType, int, int*, long long, long long, long
long, GDALRasterIOExtraArg*) (rasterio.cpp:2938)
==30978== by 0x551B09C: GDALDataset::RasterIO(GDALRWFlag, int,
int, int, int, void*, int, int, GDALDataType, int, int*, long long,
long long, long long, GDALRasterIOExtraArg*) (gdaldataset.cpp:1991)
==30978== by 0x551B11D: GDALDatasetRasterIO (gdaldataset.cpp:2034)
==30978== by 0x56384C4: GDALWarpOperation::WarpRegion(int, int,
int, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, double, double)
(gdalwarpoperation.cpp:1370)
==30978== by 0x56387C6: GDALWarpOperation::ChunkAndWarpImage(int,
int, int, int) (gdalwarpoperation.cpp:720)
==30978== by 0x57A9F5A: GDALGeoPackageDataset::CreateCopy(char
const*, GDALDataset*, int, char**, int (*)(double, char const*,
void*), void*) (ogrgeopackagedatasource.cpp:3242)
==30978== Address 0x0 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
==30978==
==30978==
==30978== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
==30978== Access not within mapped region at address 0x0
==30978== at 0x4C3259F: memset (in
/usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==30978== by 0x5692CD8: memset (string3.h:90)
==30978== by 0x5692CD8: GDALGeoPackageDataset::ReadTile(int, int,
unsigned char*, bool*) (gdalgeopackagerasterband.cpp:641)
==30978== by 0x5692FA2: GDALGeoPackageDataset::ReadTile(int, int)
(gdalgeopackagerasterband.cpp:489)
==30978== by 0x5694B51: GDALGeoPackageRasterBand::IReadBlock(int,
int, void*) (gdalgeopackagerasterband.cpp:733)
==30978== by 0x5553B15: GDALRasterBand::GetLockedBlockRef(int,
int, int) (gdalrasterband.cpp:1142)
==30978== by 0x5572525: GDALRasterBand::IRasterIO(GDALRWFlag,
int, int, int, int, void*, int, int, GDALDataType, long long, long
long, GDALRasterIOExtraArg*) (rasterio.cpp:307)
==30978== by 0x557312A:
GDALDataset::BlockBasedRasterIO(GDALRWFlag, int, int, int, int,
void*, int, int, GDALDataType, int, int*, long long, long long, long
long, GDALRasterIOExtraArg*) (rasterio.cpp:2938)
==30978== by 0x551B09C: GDALDataset::RasterIO(GDALRWFlag, int,
int, int, int, void*, int, int, GDALDataType, int, int*, long long,
long long, long long, GDALRasterIOExtraArg*) (gdaldataset.cpp:1991)
==30978== by 0x551B11D: GDALDatasetRasterIO (gdaldataset.cpp:2034)
==30978== by 0x56384C4: GDALWarpOperation::WarpRegion(int, int,
int, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, double, double)
(gdalwarpoperation.cpp:1370)
==30978== by 0x56387C6: GDALWarpOperation::ChunkAndWarpImage(int,
int, int, int) (gdalwarpoperation.cpp:720)
==30978== by 0x57A9F5A: GDALGeoPackageDataset::CreateCopy(char
const*, GDALDataset*, int, char**, int (*)(double, char const*,
void*), void*) (ogrgeopackagedatasource.cpp:3242)
==30978== If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
==30978== overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
==30978== possible), you can try to increase the size of the
==30978== main thread stack using the --main-stacksize= flag.
==30978== The main thread stack size used in this run was 8388608.
==30978==
==30978== HEAP SUMMARY:
==30978== in use at exit: 138,658,730 bytes in 10,473 blocks
==30978== total heap usage: 58,500 allocs, 48,027 frees,
326,332,504 bytes allocated
==30978==
==30978== 1,032 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record
4,171 of 4,283
==30978== at 0x4C2BBCF: malloc (in
/usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==30978== by 0x7CECC56: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7CC92F5: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7CCC5A6: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7CEB222: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7D200D7: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7D29826: sqlite3_step (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7D2A899: sqlite3_exec (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x57B297B: SQLCommand(sqlite3*, char const*)
(ogrgeopackageutility.cpp:41)
==30978== by 0x57A4D5C:
GDALGeoPackageDataset::FinalizeRasterRegistration()
(ogrgeopackagedatasource.cpp:1383)
==30978== by 0x57A9CBA: GDALGeoPackageDataset::CreateCopy(char
const*, GDALDataset*, int, char**, int (*)(double, char const*,
void*), void*) (ogrgeopackagedatasource.cpp:3150)
==30978== by 0x5522F48: GDALDriver::CreateCopy(char const*,
GDALDataset*, int, char**, int (*)(double, char const*, void*),
void*) (gdaldriver.cpp:803)
==30978==
==30978== 1,032 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record
4,172 of 4,283
==30978== at 0x4C2BBCF: malloc (in
/usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==30978== by 0x7CECC56: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7CC92F5: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7CCC5A6: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7CEB222: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7D200D7: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7D29826: sqlite3_step (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7D2A899: sqlite3_exec (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x57B297B: SQLCommand(sqlite3*, char const*)
(ogrgeopackageutility.cpp:41)
==30978== by 0x5695415:
GDALGeoPackageDataset::WriteShiftedTile(int, int, int, int, int,
int, int) (gdalgeopackagerasterband.cpp:1645)
==30978== by 0x5695CAC:
GDALGeoPackageRasterBand::IWriteBlock(int, int, void*)
(gdalgeopackagerasterband.cpp:2121)
==30978== by 0x555805F: GDALRasterBlock::Write()
(gdalrasterblock.cpp:743)
==30978==
==30978== 1,304 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record
4,186 of 4,283
==30978== at 0x4C2BBCF: malloc (in
/usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==30978== by 0x7CECC56: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7CC92F5: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7CCC5A6: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7CCD0FF: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7D003AE: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7D007FA: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7D012E8: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7D0374F: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7D06D63: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7D09554: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7D2346A: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978==
==30978== 3,912 bytes in 3 blocks are possibly lost in loss record
4,228 of 4,283
==30978== at 0x4C2BBCF: malloc (in
/usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==30978== by 0x7CECC56: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7CC92F5: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7CCC5A6: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7CCD0FF: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7D003AE: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7D007FA: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7D012E8: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7D0374F: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7D06EB7: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7D09554: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7D2346A: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978==
==30978== 710,680 bytes in 545 blocks are possibly lost in loss
record 4,275 of 4,283
==30978== at 0x4C2BBCF: malloc (in
/usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==30978== by 0x7CECC56: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7CC92F5: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7CCC5A6: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7CCD0FF: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7D003AE: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7D007FA: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7D012E8: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7D0374F: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7D09228: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7D2346A: ??? (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978== by 0x7D29826: sqlite3_step (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
==30978==
==30978== LEAK SUMMARY:
==30978== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==30978== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==30978== possibly lost: 717,960 bytes in 551 blocks
==30978== still reachable: 137,940,770 bytes in 9,922 blocks
==30978== of which reachable via heuristic:
==30978== length64 : 483,616 bytes
in 2,334 blocks
==30978== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==30978== Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are
not shown.
==30978== To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full
--show-leak-kinds=all
==30978==
==30978== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==30978== ERROR SUMMARY: 6 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
