On 3 June 2016 at 15:54, Kurt Schwehr <[email protected]> wrote: > I would make some of assertions (some just restating what Even wrote) > > * The cost to heap allocation is a fair question (but I would suggest we > defer the work until required) > > * Any work done on performance critical subroutines should be done > carefully.
I would precise: Any major changes that are supposed to improve performance should be first backed up by profiling results or complexity analysis that clearly confirm promised gains. Such results also could be used as not-slower-than reference in later benchmarks. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
