All, I've updated the proposed implementation and the RFC, mostly on improving documentation based on the feedback of this thread.
One point I've had in mind, but didn't implement, is the possibility of having a GetDataCoverageStatus() at the dataset level, in addition to the raster band level. Could potentially be useful for pixel-interleaved datasets, but that can be added later if needed. But if you work with a pixel-interleaved GeoTIFF, you can emulate that by just calling GetDataCoverageStatus() on the first band. If there are no further remarks, I'll call for a vote. Best regards, Even > Forgive me a newbie question but I'm not so familiar with the RFC process: > > - Is there any kind of timescale for this appearing in trunk or what needs > to happen for that to happen? > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/gdal-dev-Call-for-discussion-on-RFC-63 > -Sparse-datasets-improvements-tp5275443p5277676.html Sent from the GDAL - > Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spatialys.com _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
