Il 24/10/2016 12:51, Even Rouault ha scritto: > Possibly. I've just fixed the issue per > https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/6694 > and will issue a GDAL 2.1.2 RC4 with that extra fix.
thanks for that. > Hum, I'm not sure to understand. I don't see any difference when running > gdalwarp with your cutline (with --config GDALWARP_IGNORE_BAD_CUTLINE YES or > after my fix) or the cutline resulting of the union (anyway my fix doesn't > involve union'ing). Or perhaps if you enable blending ? the difference is when running the analisys as recursive, under Processing. All the best, and thanks again. -- Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=IT&q=qgis,arcgis _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
