The geos coverage is okay, but I have a hard time working with it. I've mostly been putting tests for libs that GDAL can be dependent on for lack of another place to put them as I can push the code.
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Mateusz Loskot <[email protected]> wrote: > On 21 February 2017 at 14:01, Mateusz Loskot <[email protected]> wrote: > > Kurt Schwehr-2 wrote > >> Well, it would be great if the GDAL community wants to merge that code. > > > > +1 - I'd welcome it > > Is re-writing tests of GDAL dependencies part of the big plan? > https://github.com/schwehr/gdal-autotest2/commit/ > e65e6d5aa03753c4b9a67e2cec6a8bdbe0997a80) > > AFAIK, GEOS is covered with tests pretty well. > > Best regards. > -- > Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev > -- -- http://schwehr.org
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
