On 11 April 2018 at 14:40, Even Rouault <[email protected]> wrote: > On mercredi 11 avril 2018 05:10:53 CEST Kurt Schwehr wrote: >> The auto&& is really confusing. > > A experimentally working alternative with miminal use of '&' is > > for( auto poLayer: poDS->GetLayers() ) <-- this is a plain OGRLayer*
IMHO, it's better to get users familar with these two: auto const& - as preferred default auto& - where one requires, explicitly It should cover 99.9% of uses :) Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
