More relevant question should be if OGR support GeoPackage in UTF-16, as this is defined in the spec.
I hope the GIS community some day may forget the horrible DBF limitations...

I have never encountered a shapefile in UTF-16, but I am beginning to wonder
if we ought to support them.
While nobody has ever seen one such file, that remains a rather theoretical
exercice :-)

I guess they would be more space-efficient for
languages like Chinese and Japanese, where most characters need three UTF-8
bytes but only two UTF-16 bytes. This could be important since DBF reserves
only 10 bytes for field names.

Some questions:

Can the OGR Shape driver handle UTF-16?
Probably not. I guess it would have issues with the NUL bytes found in
characters of the ASCII subset of UTF-16. The shapelib DBF API assumes NUL
terminated strings.

(I also wonder if shapefiles in UTF-16 is a good idea, or if the GIS
community just ought to forget about them, but I guess there is no definite
answer to that!)
I'd say unless such beasts are widely found in the wild, let's not bother too
much about that...

Even


--
Hälsningar

Andreas Oxenstierna
T-Kartor Geospatial AB
Olof Mohlins väg 12 Kristianstad
mobile: +46 733 206831
mailto: [email protected]
http://www.t-kartor.com

_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Reply via email to