On Wed, 1 May 2019, 20:56 Even Rouault, <even.roua...@spatialys.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > > As a feedback from the previous motion, it appears that GDAL 3.0 would > > probably better reflect the API & behaviour changes that have been done, > and > > be in accordance with our HOWTO-RELEASE procedure and semantic versionning > > rules. > > > I'm OK with that change > I'm not claiming right to vote here. Although I haven't been too active as contributor for quite some time, I'm not indifferent. I'm active user and I do monitor what's happening and I think calling the next release 3.0 is a good idea. Mateusz Loskot, mate...@loskot.net (Sent from mobile)
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
