Cameron,
 I just emailed  someone working on this .  He sent me the links below.

https://www.gps.gov/governance/advisory/

https://www.gps.gov/governance/advisory/members/higgins/

Doug

On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 5:15 PM Cameron Shorter <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> Our Australian spatial data users are about to face a systematic mismatch
> challenge when trying to use multiple static datums (GDA2020, GDA94) with
> the dynamic datum (WGS84). At the moment, it is government agencies
> grappling with the problem, but it is about to become a mainstream issue.
>
> Australia now has static datums for the years 1994 and 2020 and uses WGS84
> (a time-dependent datum!), for web-mapping and web-services.  We recognise:
> 1. Transforming from GDA94 to GDA2020 reflects Australia’s tectonic
> movement of ~ 1.8 metres to the North East.
> 2. GDA94 was defined as ‘equal to WGS84’ in 1994.
> 3. GDA2020  was defined as ‘equal to WGS84’ in 2020.
> All three statements can’t be accurate. It results in mis-aligned maps in
> WGS84
>
> I believe this is a problem the whole world needs to address, given the
> upcoming modernsation of significant national datums including the U.S and
> we need to bring this topic into an international conversation, ASAP.
> I'm interested to know if anyone here is looking into and/or has opinions
> on how it should be solved. I'd like to incorporate your ideas into the
> recommendations that we are putting foward.
> --
> Cameron Shorter
> Technology Demystifier
> Open Technologies and Geospatial Consultant
>
> M +61 (0) 419 142 254
>
>
>
>

-- 
Doug Newcomb - Cartographer
USFWS
551F Pylon Dr
Raleigh, NC
919-856-4520 ext. 14 [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

*NOTE: This email correspondence and any attachments to and from this
sender is subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and may be
disclosed to third parties.*​
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Reply via email to