On mercredi 29 janvier 2020 05:11:10 CET mike Null wrote: > Even, Carsten, thanks. > > Indeed I looked through what Even sent, and it worked. I did very much the > same thing as the C# example you just posted. > > However it got me thinking. Will I need to do this in the future? Or are > there plans for coordinate transformation to use the new axis ordering > system?
It is up to you to decide if within your application you want to stick with the not-so-well-defined 'traditional GIS order', or want to embrace natively the axis order of the CRS you manipulate. GDAL internally uses a mixed position regarding this. All the raster side uses the OAMS_TRADITION_GIS_ORDER strategy. The vector side mostly defaults to it too, except a few places like the GML driver if you specify the INVERT_AXIS_ORDER_IF_LAT_LONG=NO open option Even -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spatialys.com _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
