On 8/10/20 10:36 AM, g.jaegy wrote: > The relation is #8601362, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8601362. > > This relation has two members, #24338289 which is indeed a lake, and > #532474841 which is not a lake.
The relation in OSM is invalid. type=boundary without additional tags is already a sign. Because the outer ways in the relation have descriptive tags themselves, the relation could be considered old-style, but that's only for type=multipolygon. The member relation 5462089 is also invalid, it doesn't have a type and it has touching outer rings. You should probably ignore relations like this in your code, but the data in OSM should also be fixed. I would delete relation 8601362, move the tags from relation 5462089 to way 577387272 and merge this with way 24338289 to become one larger closed way. Then relation 5462089 can also be removed because the close way already represents the lake, no need for a relation with a single outer way (since the lake doesn't appear to have islands nor islets). Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
