Jukka, > It is late and I feel fuzzy but shouldn't the pixel_is_point variant has > smaller easting, greater northing instead, thus (-180,0439453, > 90,04394531)? > > The images are georeferenced with tiepoints/GCPs, perhaps it adds something > to the soup?
I concur with your analysis. The compensation done by GDAL to report georeferencing in its usual way is done in the wrong direction here. This is specific to tiepoints (geotransform case is a different code path), and it appears that this wasn't tested in RFC33 implementation. Pending fix per https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/2892 Even -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spatialys.com
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
