Even Rouault <[email protected]> writes: > Greg, > >> I am not following the logic here. OSGeo has a code of conduct, and >> requires that all projects use it. > > I was a bit confused because there are 2 pages: > - https://www.osgeo.org/code_of_conduct/ > - https://www.osgeo.org/resources/osgeo-code-of-conduct/ > > I actually started reading the former that would tend to point OSGeo projects > to use Contributor Covenant. Maybe one of those 2 pages is outdated.
I think what's going on is that the OSGeo Code of Conduct was adopted a while ago and there is a new rule about using a different one. > Honestly I don't really care about which CoC we select. We just need (a > somewhat reasonable) one, and above all, not create a new one. Basically agreed. >> For now, I'm opposed, and prefer to just add a line in README.md >> >> See [the standard OSGeo Code of >> Conduct](https://www.osgeo.org/resources/osgeo-code-of-conduct/). > > I had considered that too and would be fine with it. Thanks - we'll see what others say.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
