Hi Alan, Thanks for your comment. That was actually my original idea, but while I was planning to implement it appeared that it requires much more additional work, mainly because the tests of the core and the utils are not separated and tested as a single CI pipeline. I also didn't want to make such a disruption especially before I know that the general idea is accepted.
Many drafts later I ended up implementing it the way I believe would be the most future compatible and the least disruptive. It might be a good idea to reconsider that later so we can take it one step at a time. Idan On Wed, 24 Mar 2021, 22:51 Alan Snow, <alansno...@gmail.com> wrote: > One recommendation I have for this RFC would be to remove gdal_utils > entirely from the main GDAL repository and into its own repository. > The main reason would be to test against multiple versions of GDAL to > ensure compatibility. Compatibility across versions is a main goal of this > RFC if I understand correctly, so that is why I bring it up. > > Hope that is helpful, > Alan > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev >
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
