Maybe this channel is not the best place for this question. Do you know a better place to ask?
Thank you .___ ._ ..._ .. . ._. .___ .. __ . _. . __.. ... .... ._ .__ Entre dos pensamientos racionales hay infinitos pensamientos irracionales. On Tue, 6 Apr 2021 at 22:40, Javier Jimenez Shaw <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > While I was reading about COG format, I thought it was great to replace > "gdal2tiles" if the COG was properly generated (I mean, using the option > TILING_SCHEME=GoogleMapsCompatible , and maybe something else I miss. I am > generating it, so I can optimize that). > Then I was expecting that geotiff.js (or any other client js library) will > be able to do the proper RANGE request to produce the tiling that libraries > like openlayers of leaflet is expecting. Yes, in Web Mercator projection > with aligned tiles, so no transformation is needed. > > My initial target is just for RGBA uint8 images... plain vanilla. Storing > the COG file in S3, without any proxy in between doing any conversion. Just > relying on the RANGE request to get the needed area. My initial idea is to > keep the openlayers/leaflet 256x256 tiles. This allows parallel requests to > the server, and is very fast (and I do not have to refactor all my js > code). But maybe there is a better/faster solution (again, with S3 direct > access, no proxy in the server side. That would require deploying the > "proxy" on every geographical region). > > However I have not found any proper solution (my search-fu is not the > best, to be honest). I would like something that performs *at least* as > fast as the tiles produced by gdal2tiles. > > Do you know any solution/example? > > Thanks > .___ ._ ..._ .. . ._. .___ .. __ . _. . __.. ... .... ._ .__ > Entre dos pensamientos racionales > hay infinitos pensamientos irracionales. > >
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
