Hi all, I was unable to comment on https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/3682 until now. Sorry about that.
I think we should consider removing the 2nd paragraph under "Advisory Board" to help keep the maintenance sponsorship and new feature development concerns separated. It would be enough, I think, for GDAL maintainers to present to a board several times a year to keep themselves accountable to sponsors, and that new feature brainstorming -- which is out of scope -- could be done elsewhere. On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 8:50 AM Even Rouault <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I hereby motion to adopt RFC 80: > > https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/3682 > > This also implies adopting the "GDAL Sponsorship Prospectus" at > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yhMWeI_LgEXPUkngqOitqcKfp7ov6WsS41v5ulz-kd0/edit?ts=60777468# > whose a PDF version will be uploaded on the website > (https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/3681 to be updated) > > and the proposed answers to the NumFOCUS application form are at: > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bc5jdpCe1axdyBHxbJnun7e0DTyDoZI_eFYgJYnOhB8/edit > > which will be submitted consequently. > > Starting with my +1 > > Even > -- Sean Gillies
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
