Hi Even, I see that there's also a 3.2.3 candidate. Usually we discontinue the previous minor version, right? Why in this case are we have a 3.3.0rc1 and a 3.2.3rc1?
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 6:57 AM Even Rouault <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have prepared a GDAL/OGR 3.3.0 release candidate. The feedback on beta1 > was useful to spot and fix a few bugs. > > The changes between beta1 and RC1 are identified in: > > https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/commit/a882173d688e6042c9dc7b1b57d8d169b04abe2b > Note a potential impact on packaging recipees regarding a few esoteric > untested/undocumented python scripts, > now moved as "samples" scripts of the gdal-utils package > > Pick up an archive among the following ones (by ascending size): > > https://download.osgeo.org/gdal/3.3.0/gdal-3.3.0rc1.tar.xz > https://download.osgeo.org/gdal/3.3.0/gdal-3.3.0rc1.tar.gz > https://download.osgeo.org/gdal/3.3.0/gdal330rc1.zip > > A snapshot of the gdalautotest suite is also available : > > https://download.osgeo.org/gdal/3.3.0/gdalautotest-3.3.0rc1.tar.gz > https://download.osgeo.org/gdal/3.3.0/gdalautotest-3.3.0rc1.zip > > A snapshot of the documentation is at: > > https://download.osgeo.org/gdal/3.3.0/gdal330doc.zip > > GDAL-GRASS plugin: > > https://download.osgeo.org/gdal/3.3.0/gdal-grass-3.3.0.tar.gz > > NEWS at: > > https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/blob/v3.3.0RC1/gdal/NEWS > > I'll call for a vote promoting it to final later this week if no > serious problems are reported before. > > release/3.3 branch has been created for bug fixes and master is now > 3.4.0dev > > Best regards, > > Even > > -- > http://www.spatialys.com > My software is free, but my time generally not. > > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev > -- Sean Gillies
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
