> On May 26, 2021, at 8:33 PM, Nyall Dawson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Can I make the suggestion that a subset of > https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/3827 could be created and be merged > on its own? Specifically the commits which add the underlying API for > GDAL to handle epochs should be controversy-free and suitable for > merge outside of the larger/trickier question of patching in support > to the data formats. :thumbsup: As for the patching of data formats with GDAL application-specific metadata, as I said, I don't have a better option, but I'm satisfied if the process of writing epochs into metadata is opt-in (some kind of global CRS option? we already have magic switches like that). Howard _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
- [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 81: support for coo... Even Rouault
- Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 81: suppor... Howard Butler
- Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 81: su... Even Rouault
- Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 81... Even Rouault
- Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 81... Sean Gillies via gdal-dev
- Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RF... Kurt Schwehr
- Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RF... Even Rouault
- Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RF... Howard Butler
- Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: ado... Even Rouault
- Re: [gdal-dev] Motion:... Nyall Dawson
- Re: [gdal-dev] Mot... Howard Butler
- Re: [gdal-dev] Mot... Even Rouault
- Re: [gdal-dev] Mot... Sean Gillies via gdal-dev
- Re: [gdal-dev] Mot... Even Rouault
- Re: [gdal-dev] Mot... Greg Troxel
- Re: [gdal-dev] Mot... jratike80
- Re: [gdal-dev] Mot... Sean Gillies via gdal-dev
- Re: [gdal-dev] Mot... Nyall Dawson
- Re: [gdal-dev] Mot... jratike80
- Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 81: su... Greg Troxel
- Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 81... Even Rouault
