+1 FrankW I do think we need to give ourselves (the PSC) some latitude on how proposals are solicited and evaluated.
I am quite pleased with the characterization of the maintenance tasks. Best regards, On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 9:37 AM Howard Butler <how...@hobu.co> wrote: > +1 Howard > > > On Jun 8, 2021, at 7:31 AM, Mateusz Loskot <mate...@loskot.net> wrote: > > > > +1 Mateusz > > > > On Tue, 8 Jun 2021 at 12:50, Even Rouault <even.roua...@spatialys.com> > wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> Motion: > >> > >> adopt RFC 83: guidelines for the use of GDAL project sponsorship ( > >> https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/3855 ) > >> > >> Starting with my +1 > >> > >> Even > >> > >> -- > >> http://www.spatialys.com > >> My software is free, but my time generally not. > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> gdal-dev mailing list > >> gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > >> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev > > > > > > > > -- > > Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net > > _______________________________________________ > > gdal-dev mailing list > > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev > > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev > -- ---------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, warmer...@pobox.com light and sound - activate the windows | +1 650-701-7823 and watch the world go round - Rush | Geospatial Software Developer
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev