Hello, I'm debugging an artifact that I encountered while using geolocation arrays: https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/4707
While searching I found this ticket mentioning that the backward map implementation is broken and a new implementation is being considered: https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/6959 I could help with this implementation. Is there more context available on why it is being reconsidered? It seems to me that the general case for the backward implementation is very hard - for instance, what kind of discontinuities (gaps, overlaps) would be allowed in the geolocation array? Would it be expected to be robust enough to correct the Landsat 7 ETM+ SLC-off for instance? My guess is not. PS. most of this information is on the github issue, I'm not sure if this list is a better forum to discuss it. rgds., Frederico Liporace _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
