Felipe,

when using PROJ to transform a PROJ.4 string to WKT2, there's (as far as I can think of) no loss of information. Loss of information can occur in the other way round.

The main source of loss is that proj4 strings have a limited set of known datums, so sometimes you'll just have a +ellps without any +towgs84 or +nadgrids, which is underspecified.

When you've +ellps with +towgs84, datum transformations will be limited to using WGS84 as a pivot, whereas if you had a WKT2 string with the original datum name, PROJ could potentially avoid going through WGS84 when doing datum transformation.

Here's with +datum=WGS84, your PROJ.4 string is fully qualified. You can remove the +ellps=WGS84 and +towgs84=0,0,0 which are completely redundant here.

Even

Le 10/01/2022 à 21:06, Felipe Matas via gdal-dev a écrit :
Hi hi, I was looking for someplace to ask about this, and I was in doubt is was here or in PROJ, but lets do a try.

Actually, probably I'm not the only one, I have some questions about how WKT2 and PROJ4Strings are transformed.

From what I read, a PROJ4String don't have enough info to construct a precise WKT2, so, actually how PROJ4String is deprecated my main question is how to construct the right WKT2, there is a lot o data stored in the old format, there is usually no more information, and even the software/hardware that get the data in some way save all of it with all the errors.

Actually, we can transform a old CRS to a WKT2:

|> st_crs("+type=crs +proj=utm +zone=19 +south +datum=WGS84 +units=m +no_defs +ellps=WGS84 +towgs84=0,0,0" + ) Coordinate Reference System: User input: +type=crs +proj=utm +zone=19 +south +datum=WGS84 +units=m +no_defs +ellps=WGS84 +towgs84=0,0,0 wkt: BOUNDCRS[ SOURCECRS[ PROJCRS["unknown", BASEGEOGCRS["unknown", DATUM["World Geodetic System 1984", ELLIPSOID["WGS 84",6378137,298.257223563, LENGTHUNIT["metre",1]], ID["EPSG",6326]], PRIMEM["Greenwich",0, ANGLEUNIT["degree",0.0174532925199433], ID["EPSG",8901]]], CONVERSION["UTM zone 19S", METHOD["Transverse Mercator", ID["EPSG",9807]], PARAMETER["Latitude of natural origin",0, ANGLEUNIT["degree",0.0174532925199433], ID["EPSG",8801]], PARAMETER["Longitude of natural origin",-69, ANGLEUNIT["degree",0.0174532925199433], ID["EPSG",8802]], PARAMETER["Scale factor at natural origin",0.9996, SCALEUNIT["unity",1], ID["EPSG",8805]], PARAMETER["False easting",500000, LENGTHUNIT["metre",1], ID["EPSG",8806]], PARAMETER["False northing",10000000, LENGTHUNIT["metre",1], ID["EPSG",8807]], ID["EPSG",17019]], CS[Cartesian,2], AXIS["(E)",east, ORDER[1], LENGTHUNIT["metre",1, ID["EPSG",9001]]], AXIS["(N)",north, ORDER[2], LENGTHUNIT["metre",1, ID["EPSG",9001]]]]], TARGETCRS[ GEOGCRS["WGS 84", DATUM["World Geodetic System 1984", ELLIPSOID["WGS 84",6378137,298.257223563, LENGTHUNIT["metre",1]]], PRIMEM["Greenwich",0, ANGLEUNIT["degree",0.0174532925199433]], CS[ellipsoidal,2], AXIS["latitude",north, ORDER[1], ANGLEUNIT["degree",0.0174532925199433]], AXIS["longitude",east, ORDER[2], ANGLEUNIT["degree",0.0174532925199433]], ID["EPSG",4326]]], ABRIDGEDTRANSFORMATION["Transformation from unknown to WGS84", METHOD["Geocentric translations (geog2D domain)", ID["EPSG",9603]], PARAMETER["X-axis translation",0, ID["EPSG",8605]], PARAMETER["Y-axis translation",0, ID["EPSG",8606]], PARAMETER["Z-axis translation",0, ID["EPSG",8607]]]]|

So, in some way, GDAL is able to cover this "breach" of information betwen PROJ4String and WKT2, but is not like the breach does not exist, it was just handled in some way, so, the lack of info, also means, there can be othe aproximations to that CRS.

Maybe I'm just confused, and mixing things the things I read, I'm just trying to figure it out, what and how would be the right transformation from proj4string to wkt2.

Thx.


_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

--
http://www.spatialys.com
My software is free, but my time generally not.

_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Reply via email to