ok, just pushed to https://pypi.org/project/GDAL/3.2.2.1/
Le 25/03/2022 à 23:24, snehal waychal a écrit :
Dear Evan,
Oh! thank you very much for a fast test release!
I can confirm that released version works as expected. And to be sure,
here is what/how I have tested:
```
$ docker run -it python:3.7.13-slim-bullseye bash
$ apt-get update && apt-get install -y libgdal-dev gcc g++
# let's take newer, problematic setuptools
$ pip install -U setuptools
$ pip list
PackageVersion
-----------------
pip22.0.4
setuptools61.0.0
wheel0.37.1
# existing release from pypi.org <http://pypi.org> fails
$ pip install gdal==3.2.2
Collecting gdal==3.2.2
Downloading GDAL-3.2.2.tar.gz (601 kB)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 601.7/601.7 KB 8.0 MB/s
eta 0:00:00
Preparing metadata (setup.py) ... error
error: subprocess-exited-with-error
× python setup.py egg_info did not run successfully.
│ exit code: 1
╰─> [6 lines of output]
WARNING: numpy not available!Array support will not be enabled
/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/setuptools/_distutils/dist.py:275:
UserWarning: Unknown distribution option: 'use_2to3_fixers'
warnings.warn(msg)
/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/setuptools/_distutils/dist.py:275:
UserWarning: Unknown distribution option: 'use_2to3_exclude_fixers'
warnings.warn(msg)
error in GDAL setup command: use_2to3 is invalid.
[end of output]
note: This error originates from a subprocess, and is likely not a
problem with pip.
error: metadata-generation-failed
× Encountered error while generating package metadata.
╰─> See above for output.
note: This is an issue with the package mentioned above, not pip.
hint: See above for details.
# installing newer one from test.pypi.org <http://test.pypi.org>
works fine!
$ pip install -i https://test.pypi.org/simple/ GDAL==3.2.2.1
Looking in indexes: https://test.pypi.org/simple/
Collecting GDAL==3.2.2.1
Downloading
https://test-files.pythonhosted.org/packages/b7/02/4356dbdabf8f4fa898fe2378c8c096df3da254508ec8bc0663920cf4b92d/GDAL-3.2.2.1.tar.gz
(600 kB)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 600.9/600.9 KB 8.2 MB/s
eta 0:00:00
Preparing metadata (setup.py) ... done
Building wheels for collected packages: GDAL
Building wheel for GDAL (setup.py) ... done
Created wheel for GDAL:
filename=GDAL-3.2.2.1-cp37-cp37m-linux_x86_64.whl size=816416
sha256=0209dc3c56cd626137c53187c4a8fb7758587c9030cf8d479d8a2c7864fd5c77
Stored in directory:
/root/.cache/pip/wheels/4b/f2/02/0ca533c034c5cc5840d619cd7004f32d3362c04a1c1500d0a1
Successfully built GDAL
Installing collected packages: GDAL
Successfully installed GDAL-3.2.2.1
WARNING: Running pip as the 'root' user can result in broken
permissions and conflicting behaviour with the system package
manager. It is recommended to use a virtual environment
instead:https://pip.pypa.io/warnings/venv
```
I hope this gives us some confidence that we are on a right track! :)
If I should test something else, please let me know! Looking forward
for the release on the pypi.org <http://pypi.org>.
Thank you again!!
Regards,
Snehal
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 1:45 PM Even Rouault
<even.roua...@spatialys.com> wrote:
ok, I missed this was on the pypi package.
I've tried to make a patch over 3.2.2. For now, I've uploaded it
only to https://test.pypi.org/project/GDAL/3.2.2.1/ . Can you test
that and confirm that works properly ? If so, I'll push it to pypi
official.
I've tracked the changes in a patch/3.2.2.1 <http://3.2.2.1>
branch, sitting for now in my fork:
https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/compare/v3.2.2..rouault:patch/3.2.2.1?expand=1
I'll push that to OSGeo/gdal as well and tag once confirmed things
work fine
Hoping I'm not going into troubles doing this stuff outside of our
usual release processes...
Even
Le 25/03/2022 à 13:13, snehal waychal a écrit :
Dear Even, dear Bas,
Thank you very much for the quick response and highlightingthe
Debian/Ubuntu release policy aspects. And also about the link to
the ubuntugis-unstable PPA.
>/what you discuss here is all about the patch & backport policy
of the/
>/Debian GDAL package. You can try to file a bug to Debian and
point to/
>/the patch you'd want to see backported,/
But just to be sure I haven’t misunderstoodyour response or
misrepresented the original issue. The patch release I described
is also needed in the official releases of the GDAL **python**
package. If I am not mistaken, the GDAL team is taking care of
source distributions on https://pypi.org/project/GDAL/
<https://pypi.org/project/GDAL/>. I looked into released pypi
versions and if I am not mistaken there is no patch release for
v3.2.2 with fix for setuptools compatibility issue.
So, if we could make a new patch release of the/*python* package
of GDAL/ and push the sdist package to pypi.org <http://pypi.org>
(something like 3.2.2.1, as I described in the previous email)
then that would also solve the issue. Because as python
developers, we install *python* packages via pip/pipenv/poetry
and those package managers would pick the new patch release from
pypi.org <http://pypi.org>. (The GDAL library component
libgdal-dev v3.2.2 will still come from the debian system package
repo and there is no issue with that).
Hope I am not missing something obvious here. Please let me know.
Thank you again!
Regards,
Snehal
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 12:29 PM Sebastiaan Couwenberg
<sebas...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
On 3/25/22 12:07, Even Rouault wrote:
> what you discuss here is all about the patch & backport
policy of the
> Debian GDAL package. You can try to file a bug to Debian
and point to
> the patch you'd want to see backported, but I can't promise
if there
> would be interest in their maintenance team to create an
updated package
> with it (my understanding is that even if we'd release a
new 3.2.x patch
> release, it wouldn't be packaged in LTS distributions. I'm
not sure how
> much of that is linked to Debian policy or availability of
people that
> do the work)
Packages in Debian stable releases only get updates to fix
bugs of
severity important or higher [0]. GDAL patch releases also
contain
changes for lower severity issues, it's not worth the effort
to vet all
those changes. Any changes to packages in stable also risk
introducing
regressions which are highly undesirable in LTS releases
known for their
stability.
People should be maintaining their own packaging repositories
where they
host packages with changes for their needs that cannot be easily
upstreamed to the package in the distribution itself.
Scratching your
own itch was a corner stone of Open Source that people are
seemingly
forgetting or never having known about in the first place.
[0]
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.en.html#special-case-uploads-to-the-stable-and-oldstable-distributions
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
--
http://www.spatialys.com
My software is free, but my time generally not.
--
http://www.spatialys.com
My software is free, but my time generally not.
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
