Hi Kavitha, I doubt the answer has changed since your last email to the list on the topic (on 8 April).
The answer was that you should be able to enable these compiler features when compiling from source yourself, as well as a report that GDAL has been known to compile successfully with SSP. If you have had problems when trying to compile with these features enabled, then it would be better to ask about/report those issues specifically. It is very unlikely that someone else will provide custom builds of GDAL with the exact combination of compiler arguments you are looking for. The way you are wording your messages is also not coming across as very polite - it comes across as if you are expecting the community to provide these services, rather than asking what is possible, and that you have not attempted to do the compilation with your required flags. Your (or your company's) security compliance requirements are not those of the GDAL project. Regards, Daniel On Wed, 11 May 2022 at 07:12, Kavitha K <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > > Reg gdal binaries > > we could see following complaints > > *Stack Smashing Protector (SSP): no* > > *Relocation Read-Only (RELRO): no* > > > > Please tell us which *gdal version that* supports *SSP*, and *RELRO* > > > *Thanks,* > > *Kavitha* > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev >
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
