Sorry, please disregard my previous email (from my phone at lunch). I had a poor recollection of the GDALDataType enum.
Changing GDT_Byte to unsigned char is too big of a change, I guess? I can work with that. Is there any advantage to a GDT_UInt8 type that can't be changed by a PIXELTYPE option? On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 12:39 PM Even Rouault <[email protected]> wrote: > Ubyte (same as uint8) vs byte? > > what do you suggest exactly: keep GDT_Byte in the enumeration and add #define > GDT_UByte GDT_Byte to create the alias ? > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/6633#issuecomment-1307736762>, or > unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAIHIKG7X65SX4OULJMUFTWHKT5TANCNFSM6AAAAAAR2E6MJY> > . > You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: > <OSGeo/gdal/pull/6633/[email protected]> > -- Sean Gillies
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
