Sebastiaan Couwenberg <[email protected]> writes: > On 3/4/23 11:10, Landry Breuil wrote: >> what do other packagers of gdal think about it ? Providing an >> option/flavor for end-users of the packaging system to build against >> internal copies might also be possible, but that creates havoc in >> dependency trees.. > > The Debian package will keep using the external tiff because we don't > want to deal with the tiff security updates in the embedded copy. > > Features that are only available when using the embedded copy won't be > enabled in the Debian package. > > The only sane way forward is to not use private functions of tiff.
With s/Debian/pkgsrc/, +1. The right fix is that if gdal needs private APIs, to add public APIs in tiff. _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
