Hi,

take this email as a mini-RFC regarding the changes in https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/7390 which remove the SWIG python generated files from git master, and thus make the SWIG binary a requirement to build the Python bindings.

Below, the text of the PR:

This removes a long-time oddity where the SWIG generated .py and .cpp files were stored in git, which was inconvenient for contributors, requiring them to have a precise SWIG version and enabling a specific CMake variable to resync the generated files to the source files, and causing confusion to occasional contributors who sometimes accidentally submitted changes to generated files instead of their source files. This was also different from the Java and CSharp bindings, which didn't have the generated files in git and required SWIG to be available to generate them.

Bonus of this move: in the process, due to some of our most up to date CI targets using SWIG 4.1, it enabled to fix 2 errors in SWIG syntax that were rejected by SWIG 4.1 (and hidden up to now due to using 4.0.2 as our baseline)

This change shouldn't be a major hurdle for distributors, as most known binary distributions did regenerate the files anyway.

Note to people updating an existing git checkout: now the BUILD_JAVA/CSHARP/PYTHON_BINDINGS CMake variables are strictly honored. They are now initialized to ON only if all build requirements are available (SWIG and Python for the python bindings), and if set to ON but a requirement is missing, CMake fails. This might cause issues for people for example not having the requirements for the Java or CSharp bindings, but with an existing CMakeCache.txt with them set. Fix: run "cmake -UBUILD_JAVA_BINDINGS -UBUILD_CHSARP_BINDINGS -UBUILD_PYTHON_BINDINGS"

Even

--
http://www.spatialys.com
My software is free, but my time generally not.

_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Reply via email to