On Tue, 8 Oct 2024, Greg Troxel via gdal-dev wrote:
ElPaso via gdal-dev <gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org> writes:
I find it ironic that as an open source developer who probably
contributed a lot of training material to feed the AI model I myself
am banned to use it.
It's not ironic; it's taking the high moral ground and acting
responsibly. You haven't "contributed" so much as AI companies have
taken code under licenses and used that code to create derived works in
violation of those licenses, ignoring the share alike and attribution
requirements.
In my view the only reasonable approach for the open source community is
to shun bad behavior entirely.
Agreed.
However, as I understand it, by using github we have allowed
copilot to include our code without it being covered by the usual
licence.
I don't like that, but we don't seem to be talking about
looking for an alternative hosting site.
Actually, if gdal includes other code under one of the open source
licences, are *we* violating that licence by putting it on github and
allowing it to be used in copilot.
--
Andrew C. Aitchison Kendal, UK
and...@aitchison.me.uk
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
