Mike,

This sentence was written on July 8th 1999, so another decade/century/millenium :-)  Joke aside, it might still hold some truth.  It is indeed driver dependent. The base implementation, for a GDAL build against GEOS, does end up doing full geometry intersection, and most popular drivers should either call it or do something similar on the server side. One exception I've in mind is the PostGIS driver that only does server side bounding box intersection. That could/should likely be improved to do full intersection

Even

Le 29/01/2026 à 23:20, Michael Smith via gdal-dev a écrit :
I was looking at the doxygen docs for SetSpatialFilter and saw a sentence that 
surprised me:

https://gdal.org/en/stable/doxygen/classOGRLayer.html#ac37397c0deda981082cb32dcd25c85d9

Currently this test is may be inaccurately implemented, but it is guaranteed 
that all features whose envelope (as returned by 
https://gdal.org/en/stable/doxygen/classOGRGeometry.html#aa3d42b06ae6f7bbef6d1a2886da8d398)
 overlaps the envelope of the spatial filter will be returned. This can result 
in more shapes being returned that should strictly be the case.

Is this the case, is it just filtering based on geometry envelopes and not a 
strict intersection?


--
http://www.spatialys.com
My software is free, but my time generally not.

_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Reply via email to