On Thu, 23 Apr 2026 21:11:38 +0300, Laurențiu Nicola wrote: > > For free CI, I think GitHub is unbeatable.
For free-as-in-freedom is very much beatable. For free-as-in-beer the more you can use, the more free beer you get (in PostGIS we use CI from github.com and gitlab.com and others). > If you mostly want to get better CI performance, the GitHub agent can be > self-hosted And so can be agents for the OSGeo-hosted Woodpecker-CI based instance, which integrates seemlessly with the Gitea service. See "Running agents" here: https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Woodie > But the orchestration is still done on GitHub's side, so self-hosted runners > might still be affected by outages. Of course if you go OSGeo orchestration is done on OSGeo side, and affected by those outages (which OSGeo members can all help with reducing). --strk; Libre GIS consultant/developer 🎺 https://strk.kbt.io/services.html
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
