On Sun, 2009-06-07 at 19:07 +0200, Enrico Tröger wrote: > Sounds quite good so far and wouldn't require much more than a 'svn > mkdir other' :). > > But still the problem what I'm afraid of is that we end up in a mix of > various plugins, plugin releases and users might get confused where > which plugin is how developed and by whom. > OTOH while thinking about, this is already partly the case as it will > be always with independent plugins especially when a plugin author > doesn't use the geany-plugins Sourceforge project and instead use some > other place for hosting. > So, my worries about that are maybe exaggerated. Perhaps it's enough > when we try to keep update to date with the index page at > http://plugins.geany.org and http://www.geany.org/Support/Plugins as a > some kind of reference list of known plugins. > I'm all for this. So, which plugin developers (and the plugins they develop) are in favour of this move exactly? Perhaps we could have some sort of page on the website documenting this? -- Regards, Chow Loong Jin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
